Hacks mimic identity of your friend to access your information
Recently a number of people including me have received friend requests on Facebook from people they know. Why is this unusual? Because these requests are from people who are ‘already’ connected and listed as friends.
The requests are from scammers attempting to gain access to your Facebook account and utilise your information that you share only with friends. They are using the scam of Ghost Accounts. Meaning they are Fake Imposter Accounts, that have copied everything from a friends Facebook Account, that is available on public view.
Once they are accepted into your account, they are in a position to glean as much information as needed to further their scam. They send friend requests to your friends and can make an imposter account from your details.
What to do
If you receive a request, firstly check with your friend to see if they have created another account.
If they have not – Report the Imposter account and warn all the people in your friend list to also report the account.
Some helpful linked from Facebook:
- Report an account pretending to be you
- Report a fake account that’s pretending to be one of your friends
- Request a copy of what was posted about you
- Protect privacy of your image
How to fix it
Change your Profile picture and Cover photo, as the fake account is likely to have copied these and is using them. Friends can then distinguish between the imposter and the correct Facebook account.
Check what is on Public View – this is done by choosing the ‘View As’ tab on your Profile Page.
Lock down your Friend list. To do this ~ Click the friends tab on your Profile and from the dropdown box choose the option of ‘Edit Privacy’ and then ‘Only Me’.
The more difficult issue comes from a friend who appears to have just joined Facebook and sends you a request. Be on alert, verify the account by sending the friend a text message or email. Do Not Send an inbox message to this new account request, as this does not verify the account! If you are not comfortable contacting the person to verify the account, should they really be on your friend list?!
(If you feel you have to friend them, once verified, place them in the ‘Restricted’ or ‘Acquaintance’ listing so they view only a limited profile.)
Some would say the above is too cumbersome and time consuming, but how much is your information worth? Isn’t going the extra yards to protect your account, personal posts and photos worth it?! …. I think so!
Real life scenario
A new person started at the office and you later receive a friend request from them. A check of their Timeline shows their account was only opened last monday. For the moment you ignore the account request. The next day you check the account and they have managed to friend 16 of your mutual friends.
Nobody has bothered to check via text, email or other contact, to verify this person or the account. It is later discovered it is an imposter account.
This ‘friend hack’ now has access to a number of colleagues information from that work environment, along with access to their family photos, friends, other information and personal posts.
This is a real scenario, discovered this week! These work colleagues had no idea and are concerned as their information may have been downloaded, copied, printed out or shared by the fake account!
More than ever being a friend on social media, needs to hold an element of respect, trust and appreciation that you have been chosen to be an online friend.
The friends you have on Facebook need to have your back… if you can’t verify them or trust them.. ‘unfriend’ and get rid of them! This is for online safety and management of your digital reputation, not only for you, but for your family and friends.
Janita Docherty founder and Director of CyberActive Services is a trained Crime Prevention Executive with more than 18 years experience in the field of law and criminal investigation. Janita specialises in Facebook and Internet Safety instruction and is recognised for her work with law enforcement Units dedicated in the fields of E-Crime, Sex Crime, State Intelligence and Tactical Intelligence areas. Janita has an intricate knowledge on the workings of Facebook from a criminal intelligence perspective and is a leader in her field regarding Facebook training to Police and specialist law enforcement departments both in Australia and the United States. Janita has completed training with the Internet Crime Against Children (ICAC) Taskforce, and holds a number of Certifications, including a Diploma in Frontline Management, a full qualification in Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), is a Youth Mental Health First Aider and has been presented with a National Service Medal. She is held in high regard within social media and law enforcement domains, for her enthusiasm to educate professionals, regarding online safety and digital reputation management.
West Midlands Police made Press Conference history in the United Kingdom today LIVE at YouTube. For the UK, it’s the first time a police force has streamed a live press conference seeking a suspect or witness in an ongoing investigation.
In a Google world where fast is better than slow (on the web or in catching a murder), anyone can become their own media company.
However, 67% of those mobiles views are at home (in the lounge or the bedroom) as a second screen. That means, a person is sitting in the same room as a switched on TV, but uses the mobile too.
What is happening at YouTube on their lap will not reach TV until a few hours or even half a day later.
This screen capture shows how Google favours a LIVE Video and rewards that in Search. We also have a few new features with Google+ Hangouts like a LIVE Rewind button that gives the audience complete control.
So, if you arrive at the LIVE feeds a few minutes late, one click restarts the broadcast (similar to sky or cable TV). Another click and you are LIVE again. As you drag the slider, mini thumbnails appear giving you a visual clue on what you have missed (TV does not do this).
We can also see YouTube generates a snapshot of the broadcast and places that at the YouTube LIVE page giving you an instant glimpse in the program.
Finally, this is free. Anyone can do this. Feel free to ask me how to get started.
In Canada, Constable Scott Mills of the Toronto Police Service uses backpack journalism to stream similar press conferences and reports from the street. We also have Kerry Blakeman from +West Midlands Police already using LIVE at YouTube with more planned broadcasts this month.
Constable Mills has lead the effort at Toronto Police to broadcast live from the scene of a homicide, and when Dean Wichar was arrested for the John Raposa murder, he broadcast from the lobby of Toronto’s 51 Division in the evening with an Internet signal tethered from a print media reporter’s iPhone.
Let me leave you with the Press Conference as it happened and the accompanying CCTV video of a man and a vehicle.
Mike Downes – Teacher, Broadcaster, Google+ Hangout Specialist
After spending fifteen years as a school teacher, Mike moved to local media by starting whatsinKenilworth.com in April 2010. After getting noticed by mainstream media (by blogging about Library closures and local Policing), Google+ opened in June 2011 allowing a whole new experience. Mike quickly saw Hangouts as a realtime video tool that connected people. Anoek Eckhardt, Communications and Public Affairs Manager at Google said: “Mike is a great ambassador for Google+. His interaction with thousands of people from across the world to share knowledge, advice and learn together highlights the collaborative power of Google+.
If you’re interested in British Police use of social media, you should definitely follow Mike Downes (@mikedownesmedia) who produces an incredibly useful monthly statistical update on UK police social media accounts.
In his latest post, Mike has focused on the sharp increase in the number of people “Liking” police Facebook posts – where 16 forces had month-on-month growth of over 20%.
I thought I’d do a little analysis and look at exactly what sort of police posts people like.
What do the public like on police Facebook pages
Mike found that three police forces had the highest rate of increase in Facebook “likes” compared to the previous month: Hampshire, Greater Manchester and Strathclyde. I looked at the Facebook pages for these three forces and identified the five most popular posts from each in the month under review. Where more than one post covered the same subject, I aggregated the number of likes and treated them as one post.
In Hampshire (@hantspolice), the post that provoked the most public response was a photo of a police car parked in a disabled bay at MacDonalds which the Constabulary had to explain occurred when an officer went to investigate an offence, not to get a Big Mac and fries.
Tragically, the second most popular post related to an officer who had died on duty in a Road Traffic Accident.
Two of the three other most popular posts related to missing people who had been found and one was a plea for information relating to an assault on a pensioner.
In Greater Manchester (@gmpolice), by far the most popular post had photos of a new police dog’s first day at work.
Interestingly, the second most popular post was also about dogs – in this case, a story about local dog thefts.
As in Hampshire, two of the top five posts related to missing persons with the other a plea for information on the anniversary of an unsolved murder case.
Once we look at the Strathclyde data (now @policescotland), some themes start emerging:
Yet again,we have one post relating to dogs and one to a missing person. The second most popular post related to the amalgamation of all seven Scottish police forces into Police Scotland and the other two were concerned with police successes: the conviction and sentence of murderers and the arrest of sex offenders.
So, what have we learnt from this not-so-scientific mini analysis?
The public seem to respond to some key categories of Facebook post:
- Information pleas and good news about (particularly vulnerable) missing persons – 5 out of these 15 posts.
- Posts relating to animals (in this case all dogs) – 3 out of 15.
- Controversy (amalgamation of Scottish forces, parking in disabled bay) – 2 out of 15.
- Successes – criminals arrested or sentenced, particularly in high profile cases – 2 out of 15.
It is no surprise that UK police forces are such advocates of social media.
Facebook allows them to engage with the public with ease, show a very wide range of their work and quickly spread request for information.
It’s also a great medium for celebrating success.
What does your force usually post on Facebook?
You might also like BrightPlanet’s infographic analysing the 1St Global Police Tweetathon which shows the favourite topics for police services to tweet about.
Please contribute via the comments section below.
Police departments of old always operated by one simple motto…”nothing to see here, move along.” In the age of social it’s hard to change that mentality, especially if you we’re raised with the above motto. Police held their information close to the vest and hardly communicated at all with the public. When you used to see several police cars on a street in the middle of the night citizens were left wondering, “what’s going on.”
I remember a day not so long ago when you said nothing, “don’t talk to the press,” “I can’t comment, please speak with the PIO,” “an official statement is forthcoming.”
Now news doesn’t break, it tweets. Information moves so fast, that if you wait for an official press release, the information is old news.
So when you think about social media strategies, it boils down to one simple trick, Be Social. Here is my simple strategy for police departments and the use of social media.
After you accept that social media has a role to play in your departments communication, the majority don’t yet know how best to use them. This is why it is important to listen first. I remember when I started Twitter for my department, all I did was scour social media sites listening to what people were saying. What they were saying about my city, my department, and what they were doing in the community.
Social media is an amazing source of insight, offering unfiltered evidence of people’s behaviors and attitudes. Listening to what they are saying online allows you to get a glimpse of what is going on in your community. Listening also helps us decide what kind of information will be received by your followers and what content we can use to engage the public. For example, by monitoring the community we were able to create a better traffic awareness plan for traffic safety and enforcement.
But it doesn’t stop there.
Once you are engaged with your community the listening doesn’t stop, but becomes an ongoing process. People’s conversations continues during and after we act, we have to keep asking questions to understand the people’s needs and wants.
Active listening is required- giving feedback is important to make clear that we are really listening. It sends a powerful message: ‘you are important, and we are listening.’
Talk to people. The driving force behind social media is ordinary people sharing their experiences online with a broad community. This includes how they have been touched by your “brand,” both in a positive and negative light. It is important for law enforcement to tell their own story, rather than letting our customers, or detractors, including the media, tell it for us.
Social media requires conversation, unlike the old press release days were we guarded our information and put out only what we thought was relevant content. Departments must foster mutually beneficial dialogue and information exchange. Unlike standard operating procedure, we use our community to help do our jobs. People call the police and we respond. People tell us there is a problem and we respond. An informant tells us there is illegal activity and we respond. Doesn’t sound much different, does it. We must foster our relationships with the social media community to respond to their needs. We must create that dialogue with our online community which involves sharing, attention, interest, understanding, and activity.
Once we have fostered that relationship, obtained followers and likes, etc. we must then give them something to talk about. Your followers are interested and want to know what’s going on. People want to see the good things your department is doing in the community. What I found from my listening efforts is that people want to see all the good things your department is doing. Some of our best responses from our community have been showing the better side of police work, the officer retiring after 30 years. The
youth cadet program that wins an award, the citizen going on her first ride along at 86 years old.
Television media is filled with horror and bad things people go through, even department
or officer controversy, what your people want, and will talk about, is how their
department is doing great things in the community.
Being a police department is not a brand that people are naturally going to talk about or
engage with, but by tapping into these ‘relevance by association’ topics as I’ve touched
on above, will get people talking about what they are passionate about, seeing their
community grow from your departments involvement in it. The key is to generate
content or a story that both it, and the community can participate in together.
3. Monitor and Optimize (Return on Investment)
Measuring behavior within social media for law enforcement is different from traditional businesses because there are so many more actions that are measurable and do not rely on sales. Measurements such as posts, comments, links, votes, views, likes, retweets, are just a few which are comparable to traditional media sources.
Constant, on going measurement is vital. This can be used to measure the success of content but also to continuously develop conversations and drive your ‘brand.”
Some possible metrics for measuring social media for public safety are as follows:
Behavioral metrics are used to gauge the level of attention or engagement your activity Is generating, for example the volume of conversations or mentions. Share of conversation, meaning what proportion of conversations are about your department.
Awareness, perception, and sentiment metrics are used to see how much time people are spending on your sites, and what impact traditional media is having on social behavior online.
Attitudinal or sentiment metrics can be used to gauge your activity’s emotional responses or impact on attitudes to your brand.
Ecosystem metrics can be used to get a sense of the wider impact of your activity, for example what is the origin of the conversation? Which local followers, sources, and sites are influential? The number and activity of fans and followers can also be measured.
The use of social media should not be used like conventional media. Social networks, networks of people, are not mass media channels.
Social media is not a cure. It is a tool for public safety to use along with other means of communication and engagement.
Social media grew from the ground up, by the people, and for the people. It cannot be run from the top down.
Finally, social media is not a campaign, it’s an ongoing commitment to talk with the people in your community, as I said at the beginning it’s all about being social, talking, something we do every day. But remember, once you are out there, you have to stay out there.
Officer Chris Rasmussen has been in Law Enforcement for 22 years having served with the San Francisco Police and the Redwood City Police Department. Officer Rasmussen was one of the founding members of the Redwood City Police Social Media Team. He has also worked with the City of Redwood City on developing the Citywide social media policy. Officer Rasmussen was one of the founding members and coordinator of the Bay Area Law Enforcement Social Media Group (#BALESMG). Chris has 20 years of experience as a Law Enforcement Trainer in a variety of fields including Use of Force, defensive tactics, tactical baton, TASER, community policing, and social media. Chris is also a member of the police honor guard, patrol rifle team, and is part of the Technology Committee for the department.